.md file to compare - side-by-side diff against tool-scout
tool-scout
description: "Triggers on prompt mention of 'tool-scout'."
What it does for you
Catches tools you mention in meetings and checks if you already have them.
What it produces
A recent result, so you can see the kind of work it returns.
loading…
How to get it
These run inside the Snappy workspace. Want this working in your business? I set skills like this up with you, in one focused week.
For developers how this skill is built, graded, and how it runs
at a glance- the short version
what's inside - the parts that make up a skill 2/4 present
A skill is just a few plain-text files. Only the main one is required. The rest are optional, added as the work needs them. This is what the skill is made of; how it runs is just below.
state/skills/tool-scout/SKILL.md
present
state/lib/tool-scout.ts
not present
state/bin/tool-scout/
not present
state/skills/tool-scout/AGENTS.md
present
how it's graded - what counts as a good run 4 criteria · 4 deterministic
Each row is one thing a good run has to get right. deterministic means a quick check decides, pass or fail. judge means the AI reads the result and rates it. Grading each piece on its own (instead of one overall score) shows exactly where a run fell short, so the fix is obvious.
how it runs - the shared frame every skill uses 3/5 present
Every skill runs the same way. One part does the work, a separate part checks it, and a short loader hands the AI exactly what it needs for the job. Anything this skill doesn't use shows a one-line note saying why, on purpose, not by accident.
No separate check found. Without one, the part that makes the work could end up approving its own work, worth a closer look.
state/log/evals.ndjson - ALWAYS post-filter regex matches with a Gemini dispatch — keyword regex false-positives on casual mentions ("I was thinking about trying Supabase") and pollutes the gap report
- ALWAYS check BOTH state/lib/<tool>.ts AND state/skills/<tool>.md for coverage — a tool with one but not the other counts as a partial gap, not full coverage
- This is a TELEMETRY skill — the score is always 1.0 if the shape gate passes; do not invent a pass/fail rubric on top
- ALWAYS read meetings cache from ~/.claude/cache/krisp/ (written by state/bin/krisp/refresh.sh); if the cache is empty, log primary_issue: "krisp-cache-missing" and emit zero-mention shape, never silently no-op
what it has learned - fixes written back in over time sample
When a run hits something this skill didn't handle, the fix gets written back into the skill so it doesn't happen again. FIXED means it was corrected on the spot. LOGGED means it's queued for a bigger rewrite. Either way, the skill gets a little better and never makes the same mistake twice.
- Loading feedback rows…
how the work flows- step by step
prose skill — follow steps in `state/skills/tool-scout/SKILL.md`
SKILL.md- the skill, written out in plain English
tool-scout
Reads meetings cache, greps transcripts for known tool keywords (Xano, Fly, Neon, Cloudflare, Supabase, Vercel, Claude Code, etc.), and cross-checks state/lib/ + state/skills/ for coverage.
Steps
- Read meetings cache from
~/.claude/cache/krisp/. - For each transcript, regex-match the tool keyword set.
- For each mentioned tool, check whether a
state/lib/<tool>.tsor
state/skills/<tool>.md exists.
- Emit a gap report:
{mentioned, covered, gaps}.
Eval
score("tool-scout", run_id, {
score: 1.0,
mentioned: mentioned.length,
covered: covered.length,
gaps: gaps.length,
});
No pass/fail - this is a telemetry skill. The score is always 1.0 if the shape gate passes.
Gotchas
- Keyword regex will false-positive on casual mentions ("I was thinking
about trying Supabase"). Dispatch a gemini pass to drop those.
Rubric
criteria:
- name: transcript_processing
kind: deterministic
check: "The skill must read meetings cache from `~/.claude/cache/krisp/` and process all available transcripts."
- name: keyword_matching
kind: deterministic
check: "The skill must correctly identify instances of known tool keywords (Xano, Fly, Neon, Cloudflare, Supabase, Vercel, Claude Code) within the transcripts using regex matching."
- name: coverage_check
kind: deterministic
check: "For each mentioned tool, the skill must accurately check for the existence of `state/lib/<tool>.ts` or `state/skills/<tool>.md`."
- name: gap_report_accuracy
kind: deterministic
check: "The skill must emit a gap report with correctly counted 'mentioned', 'covered', and 'gaps' fields as described in the 'Eval' section."AGENTS.md- what the AI loads when this skill comes up
tool-scout - loader
Per-turn rules for the tool-scout skill. Full reference: state/skills/tool-scout/SKILL.md. Do not skip these.
Critical Rules
- ALWAYS post-filter regex matches with a Gemini dispatch - keyword regex false-positives on casual mentions ("I was thinking about trying Supabase") and pollutes the gap report
- ALWAYS check BOTH
state/lib/<tool>.tsANDstate/skills/<tool>.mdfor coverage - a tool with one but not the other counts as a partial gap, not full coverage - This is a TELEMETRY skill - the score is always
1.0if the shape gate passes; do not invent a pass/fail rubric on top - ALWAYS read meetings cache from
~/.claude/cache/krisp/(written bystate/bin/krisp/refresh.sh); if the cache is empty, logprimary_issue: "krisp-cache-missing"and emit zero-mention shape, never silently no-op
Commands
| ui dashboard | state/skills/tool-scout/resources/ui.openui | |invoke: prose skill - follow steps in state/skills/tool-scout/SKILL.md |krisp cache: ~/.claude/cache/krisp/ |coverage check: state/lib/<tool>.ts and state/skills/<tool>.md |eval log: state/log/evals.ndjson (skill: "tool-scout") - {score: 1.0, mentioned, covered, gaps}
OpenUI Resource
- Skill-owned OpenUI Lang resource:
state/skills/tool-scout/resources/ui.openui. Read it before rendering or editing this skill's generated component surface. - Treat this resource as a first-class artifact of the skill, not a generic chat response. Improve it when the skill's user-facing output needs to become richer.
- System resources compose OpenUI primitives and inherit SnappyChat tokens. Use
ui_contract: brandedin SKILL.md only for deliberate platform or client visuals.
Known Pitfalls
- Casual mentions ("we should probably try Supabase someday") get counted as real demos without a Gemini filter pass
- Counting only library coverage and missing skill-page coverage (or vice versa) under-reports gaps
- Treating tool-scout as pass/fail instead of telemetry - the value is the gap list, not a 0/1 score
Self-Test
An agent reading this should correctly:
- [ ] Run a Gemini dispatch over regex matches to drop casual mentions?
- [ ] Check both
state/lib/andstate/skills/for a tool before declaring it covered? - [ ] Score 1.0 whenever shape passes, treating this skill as telemetry not pass/fail?
Self-report
If this loader fell short, append a line:
echo "[$(date -u +%FT%TZ)] tool-scout: <what was missing>" >> state/log/loader-feedback.log
<!-- kernel-ok: historical attribution for the PID-loader pattern. -->
Self-correcting loader (PID feedback)
This is the rule that makes loaders learn. Ported from snappy-kernel, where it demonstrably worked: the snappy-dom-cartographer skill mapped Skool admin UI once, every later ship-agent inherited the full map for free.
Before you finish, do two things:
1. Fix gaps (P - proportional). MANDATORY. If this loader didn't cover your case - if you had to read another file, run an undocumented command, work around a wrong selector, or discover a quirk - you MUST attempt an Edit to this AGENTS.md before you log.
- Default action: edit this file. Surgical. Add the missing line, table
row, or code example where it belongs. No restructuring.
- Only
LOGGEDis allowed when: the fix needs >10 lines, spans multiple
files, or requires a structural rewrite. In that case the state/regen/drain.sh queue picks it up asynchronously.
- "I didn't have time" / "it's minor" / "the next agent will figure it out"
are NOT valid reasons. Minor gaps compound - that's the whole point of this loop.
- Concrete example of a valid P-fix: discover
agent-browser screenshot
takes path positionally not as --output <path>. One line in a table. Edit it in. Do not just log it.
- The goal: the next agent never has to leave the loader.
2. Log the result.
echo "[$(date -u +%FT%TZ)] tool-scout: <what was missing or fixed> [FIXED|LOGGED]" >> state/log/loader-feedback.log
FIXED= you patched this loader inline (P-fix).LOGGED= too large for inline; the PostToolUse enqueue + Stop-hook drain
will rewrite the loader from scratch on next session-end.
Do not skip this. Every agent run must leave the system better than it found it. The loader is the setpoint; you are the sensor; the gap is the error signal; closing the gap is the correction.
api.ts- the code it can call
⚠ no api.ts - this skill has no typed action surface
scripts- helper scripts it can run
prose-only skill - 2 inline code blocks live in SKILL.md above (no state/bin/ sidecar yet).
how we check it- the checks, plus the last 10 runs
| timestamp | verb | score | primary_issue | artifact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-25 04:11Z | - | 1.00 | - | - |
| 2026-04-21 15:58Z | - | 1.00 | - | - |
| 2026-04-21 15:57Z | - | 1.00 | - | - |
| 2026-04-21 03:53Z | - | 1.00 | - | - |
| 2026-04-16 19:24Z | - | 1.00 | - | - |
| 2026-04-16 18:43Z | - | 1.00 | - | - |
| 2026-04-25 04:11Z | - | 1.00 | - | - |
| 2026-04-21 15:58Z | - | 1.00 | - | - |
| 2026-04-21 15:57Z | - | 1.00 | - | - |
| 2026-04-21 03:53Z | - | 1.00 | - | - |